Similar things have happened repeatedly, going all the way back to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, which was blamed on a hostile right-wing atmosphere in Dallas, even though the assassin had a long history of being on the far left fringe.


By Thomas Sowell

Since so many in the media cannot resist turning every tragedy into a political talking point, it was perhaps inevitable that (1) someone would try to link the shooting rampage at the Batman movie in Colorado to the Tea Party, and that (2) some would try to make it a reason to impose more gun control laws.

(White House says Obama could address gun control issue; Chicago Tribune, July 24, 2012)

Too many people in the media cannot seem to tell the difference between reporting the news and creating propaganda.

NBC News apparently could not resist doctoring the transcript of the conversation between George Zimmerman and the police after the Trayvon Martin shooting. Now ABC News took the fact that the man arrested for the shooting in Colorado was named James Holmes to broadcast to the world the fact that there is a James Holmes who is a member of the Tea Party in Colorado.

The fact has since come out that these are two different men, one in his 20s and the other in his 50s. But corrections never catch up with irresponsible news broadcasts. The James Holmes who belongs to the Tea Party has been deluged with phone calls. I hope he sues ABC News for every dime they have.

This is not the first time that the mainstream media have tried to create a link between conservatives and violence. Years ago, the Oklahoma City bombing was blamed on Rush Limbaugh, despite the absence of any evidence that the bomber was inspired by Rush Limbaugh.

Similar things have happened repeatedly, going all the way back to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, which was blamed on a hostile right-wing atmosphere in Dallas, even though the assassin had a long history of being on the far left fringe.

But, where the shoe is on the other foot — as when the Unabomber had a much marked-up copy of an environmentalist book by Al Gore — the media heard no evil, saw no evil and spoke no evil. If people in the media cannot decide whether they are in the business of reporting news or manufacturing propaganda, it is all the more important that the public understand that difference, and choose their news sources accordingly.

As for gun control advocates, I have no hope whatever that any facts whatever will make the slightest dent in their thinking — or lack of thinking. New York’s Mayor Bloomberg and CNN’s Piers Morgan were on the air within hours of the shooting, pushing the case for gun control laws.

You might never know, from what they and other gun control advocates have said, that there is a mountain of evidence that gun control laws not only fail to control guns but are often counterproductive. However, for those other people who still think facts matter, it is worth presenting some of those facts.

Do countries with strong gun control laws have lower murder rates? Only if you cherry-pick the data.

Britain is a country with stronger gun control laws than the United States, and lower murder rates. But Mexico, Russia and Brazil are also countries with stronger gun control laws than the United States — and their murder rates are much higher than ours. Israel and Switzerland have even higher rates of gun ownership than the United States, and much lower murder rates than ours.

Even the British example does not stand up very well under scrutiny. The murder rate in New York has been several times that in London for more than two centuries — and, for most of that time, neither place had strong gun control laws. New York had strong gun control laws years before London did, but New York still had several times the murder rate of London.

It was in the later decades of the 20th century that the British government clamped down with severe gun control laws, disarming virtually the entire law-abiding citizenry. Gun crimes, including murder, rose as the public was disarmed.

Meanwhile, murder rates in the United States declined during the same years when murder rates in Britain were rising, which were also years when Americans were buying millions more guns per year.

The real problem, both in discussions of mass shootings and in discussions of gun control, is that too many people are too committed to a vision to allow mere facts to interfere with their beliefs, and the sense of superiority that those beliefs give them.

Any discussion of facts is futile when directed at such people. All anyone can do is warn others about the propaganda.


See fellow SLOB take on Colorado shooter, over at Doo Doo Economics Blog: “James Holmes is a homegrown terrorist not simply a “nut job”.”



  1. I was in a thread discussion the other day, where one individual was advocating stronger gun control laws and was demanding that the pro-gun people on the thread cite examples of how gun control doesn’t work. I used Mexico, as a fine example and, like this author, I used Israel and Switzerland as prime examples of countries with very high gun ownership and hardly any gun related crime. I also noted that in Mexico, they like to use machetes to severe the heads of their victims. I should have also used African genocides like Rwanda, Liberia and Sudan as fine examples of how thousands of people can be killed in mass without guns. The anti-gun person, evidently didn’t have a counter argument to my examples.
    The prevalence of gun related crime, I believe, is related to culture. The problem with gun violence is this country has nothing to do with guns, but rather the mental stability of the person wielding the gun. Maybe if we took the time to instill the youth of this country with more discipline, social skills and honor we wouldn’t have to worry about things like this happening. The only thing that can’t be accounted for, is the violence committed by the truly mentally ill.

    • All very true, JT! Culture is paramount… That, and the way in which that society deals with mental illness. We wait until the mentally ill comitt a crime to do something about them. It wasn’t always that way… There was a time when a person could be comitted for a hosptial for treatment BEFORE they killed someone.

  2. Pingback: WALKBACK: The New Internet Dance Craze!!! « Temple of Mut

  3. I live in Wyoming. We have permitless conceal/carry here. We also have Castle Doctrine. Violent crime is generally restricted to domestic violence. Home invasions, car-jackings, mass shootings – they don’t happen. There is a direct correlation there. Criminals, when not simply crazy, are generally cowards. They prey on victims that they consider weaker than themselves. They certainly don’t break into houses that contain residents willing to shoot-to-kill intruders.

    It makes for a much more polite society.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s